Tsai-Wu vs Hashin on composite tubes: the GFRP pole fails… but how?

Treinamento guiFW / English

124 vues
0 Aime
0 0
The Tsai-Wu index tells you WHEN a part fails. It doesn't tell you HOW. In this technical training we apply the Tsai-Wu and Hashin failure criteria to a 12 m × 300 daN GFRP pole (a follow-up to the structural calculation video of the same pole) and show why, in filament-wound tubular structures, that difference changes the design decision.

What you'll see:
• How combined loads (bending, shear, axial and torsion) become σ1, σ2 and τ12 stresses in each layer (micromechanics + classical laminate theory)
• Why von Mises and Tresca give false confidence in composites (FS ≈ 8.6 vs an actual R ≈ 1.92)
• Tsai-Wu: one global, interactive index, easy to code — and its limitation
• Hashin (1980): four physical modes — fiber/matrix, tension/compression
• Ply and laminate failure envelopes, and a map of the index along the height and around the tube
• Progressive failure (ply discount) up to collapse, compared with local buckling

Case-study results (critical section 0.4 m above ground, nominal load):
• Tsai-Wu: R = 1.86 → FS/R index = 0.808 with FS = 1.5 (passes)
• Hashin: first failure = matrix tension cracking in the ±88° hoop layer, R = 1.92
• Fiber rupture (±15° layers): ≈ 9.3× the nominal load
• Local wall buckling: 6.13× · progressive collapse: 8.82×
The matrix warns you; the wall and the fiber decide.

Chapters
0:00 Intro: does the pole fail? How does it fail?
0:44 guiFW said 1.027. But what broke?
1:17 Combined loads at the pole base
1:50 From tube to ply: σ1, σ2, τ12
2:25 Why von Mises gives false confidence
2:55 The Tsai-Wu criterion
3:30 The Hashin criterion: four failure modes
3:58 Ply envelopes: one ellipse vs four boundaries
4:28 Case study: critical section, layer by layer
4:54 Where it fails: along the height and around the tube
5:16 Progressive failure: from first crack to collapse
5:48 The main lesson
6:09 Laminate envelopes in the σx–τxθ plane
6:35 Design decisions that delay the first crack
7:05 What about guiFW?
7:30 Designer's checklist

Code for this video (Python): micromechanics, CLT, loads, Tsai-Wu, Hashin, progressive failure, envelopes and charts — output to JSON, CSV and a calculation report.

References
• Tsai, S. W.; Wu, E. M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J. Composite Materials, 1971.
• Hashin, Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J. Applied Mechanics, 1980.
• Strength tests: ASTM D3039, D6641, D3518, D2290.

Material and load values are examples. For a real design, use strengths measured on your own material and process.

guiFW — filament winding software and G-code: https://guifw.com

#composites #GFRP #TsaiWu #Hashin #filamentwinding #structuralengineering #FRP

Partager sur des réseaux sociaux

Partager le lien

Use permanent link to share in social media

Partager avec un ami

S'il vous plaît S'identifier envoyer ceci video par courriel!

The Tsai-Wu index tells you WHEN a part fails. It doesn't tell you HOW. In this technical training we apply the Tsai-Wu and Hashin failure criteria to a 12 m × 300 daN GFRP pole (a follow-up to the structural calculation video of the same pole) and show why, in filament-wound tubular structures, that difference changes the design decision.

What you'll see:

• How combined loads (bending, shear, axial and torsion) become σ1, σ2 and τ12 stresses in each layer (micromechanics + classical laminate theory)

• Why von Mises and Tresca give false confidence in composites (FS ≈ 8.6 vs an actual R ≈ 1.92)

• Tsai-Wu: one global, interactive index, easy to code — and its limitation

• Hashin (1980): four physical modes — fiber/matrix, tension/compression

• Ply and laminate failure envelopes, and a map of the index along the height and around the tube

• Progressive failure (ply discount) up to collapse, compared with local buckling

Case-study results (critical section 0.4 m above ground, nominal load):

• Tsai-Wu: R = 1.86 → FS/R index = 0.808 with FS = 1.5 (passes)

• Hashin: first failure = matrix tension cracking in the ±88° hoop layer, R = 1.92

• Fiber rupture (±15° layers): ≈ 9.3× the nominal load

• Local wall buckling: 6.13× · progressive collapse: 8.82×

The matrix warns you; the wall and the fiber decide.

Chapters

0:00 Intro: does the pole fail? How does it fail?

0:44 guiFW said 1.027. But what broke?

1:17 Combined loads at the pole base

1:50 From tube to ply: σ1, σ2, τ12

2:25 Why von Mises gives false confidence

2:55 The Tsai-Wu criterion

3:30 The Hashin criterion: four failure modes

3:58 Ply envelopes: one ellipse vs four boundaries

4:28 Case study: critical section, layer by layer

4:54 Where it fails: along the height and around the tube

5:16 Progressive failure: from first crack to collapse

5:48 The main lesson

6:09 Laminate envelopes in the σx–τxθ plane

6:35 Design decisions that delay the first crack

7:05 What about guiFW?

7:30 Designer's checklist

Code for this video (Python): micromechanics, CLT, loads, Tsai-Wu, Hashin, progressive failure, envelopes and charts — output to JSON, CSV and a calculation report.

References

• Tsai, S. W.; Wu, E. M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J. Composite Materials, 1971.

• Hashin, Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J. Applied Mechanics, 1980.

• Strength tests: ASTM D3039, D6641, D3518, D2290.

Material and load values are examples. For a real design, use strengths measured on your own material and process.

guiFW — filament winding software and G-code: https://guifw.com

#composites #GFRP #TsaiWu #Hashin #filamentwinding #structuralengineering #FRP

Vues

  • 124 Total des vues
  • 124 Vues du Site web

Actions

  • 0 Partages Sociaux
  • 0 Aime
  • 0 N'aime pas
  • 0 Commentaires

Partagez le comptage

  • 0 Facebook
  • 0 Twitter
  • 0 LinkedIn
  • 0 Google+